When Satellites Fall: On the Trails of Cosmos 954 and USA 193
Lisa Parks / UC Santa Barbara
During the past 50 years approximately 17,000 human-made objects have re-entered the earth’s atmosphere. Most of these objects incinerate as they tumble toward the planet, but many fragments fall upon the earth. On a few occasions rogue satellites have fallen, raising concerns about public safety and posing threats to the natural environment. In this essay I discuss two incidents when satellites that were falling back to earth became high-profile media events. The first was a Soviet radar satellite, Cosmos954, in 1978 and the second a US spy satellite, USA193, in 2008. These events are significant moments for media studies for several reasons. First, they draw attention to publicly-funded secret satellites that have historically been used to image the earth and manage geopolitical tensions. Second, they reveal the deeply intertwined relation of satellite media to issues of global security and serve as a reminder, as Jim Schwoch has shown, that the greatest global communication technologies emerged alongside the most dangerous technologies of global destruction.1 Finally, these moments provide an opportunity to contemplate the high costs of satellite failure, which result not only in communication breakdowns and huge financial losses, but can have detrimental effects on the environment as well.
Cosmos 954
On January 24, 1978 a Soviet radar satellite, known as Cosmos 954, plummeted into the Great Slave Lake area of the Northern Territories in Canada (roughly the same area where the television show Ice Road Truckers is now shot). The satellite was launched from a facility in Kazakhstan on September 18, 1977 and by October 29, 1977 NORAD monitors revealed that Cosmos 954 was out of orbit and predicted it would re-enter the earth’s atmosphere sometime in April 1978. The primary concern about Cosmos 954’s tumble back to earth was the nuclear reactor it had on board. Because the satellite was carrying 110 pounds of enriched uranium, some officials predicted Cosmos 954’s crash could result in the “worst nuclear contamination since Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”2 Since US and Canadian officials were uncertain where Cosmos 954 would land, they decided not to issue a public announcement detailing the nuclear concern. When it became clear, however, that Cosmos 954 would fall months earlier than predicted, the US State Department on January 18, 1978 relayed a secret message to its NATO allies and to Australia, Japan and New Zealand informing state diplomats about the matter.
On January 24, 1978 the world’s news agencies sent reporters to the icy tundra near Yellowknife to investigate the “killer satellite.” Journalists reported on the massive size of the debris field, the fragments that had been recovered, the nature of the retrieval mission and the Canadian government’s attempts to communicate with Inuit communities in the vicinity of the crash whose water and food supplies were in danger of exposure to radiation. After the satellite fell, the US Departments of Energy and Defense banded together with Canadian agencies to mount a five-month retrieval mission called Operation Morning Light that utilized U2 and KC-135 aircraft to help locate concentrations of radioactive particulate and recover the satellite’s fragments. Since the Soviets were tight-lipped about the satellite’s composition, some suggest the recovery effort was as much about investigating the current state of Soviet satellite technology as it was about retrieving radioactive debris.
In the months following the crash the Canadian government sought compensation from the Soviet Union in the amount of $3 million (Canadian) under the 1972 Convention on International Liability for Damage caused by Space Objects. This international law holds satellite owners liable for the damages caused when space objects fall back to earth. The Soviets fought this case claiming that Cosmos 954 had broken up by the time it fell to earth and thus could no longer be recognized as a “satellite” when it landed in the Northwest Territories. The fall of Cosmos 954 not only established an occasion to test satellite liability law, but Operation Morning Light became a prototype for future satellite recovery missions.
USA 193
Almost exactly thirty years after Cosmos 954 fell, another satellite drifted out of orbit and began to move toward Earth. USA 193 was a classified spy satellite (also known as NROL-21) that had been launched on December 14, 2006 from Vandenberg Air Force base in California. Communication with the satellite failed shortly after its launch. Rather than allow USA 193 to fall to the earth’s surface, the US government devised an elaborate scheme to intercept and destroy it with an SM-3 missile. US officials expressed concerns about the 1000-pound tank of hydrazine fuel on board the satellite and claimed it could form into a toxic cloud the size of two football fields if the satellite were to crash and pose a serious public health risk. Many were skeptical of this claim and speculated instead that the US did not want this classified satellite to fall into foreign hands because future US spysat fleets were slated to use similar technologies. Still others interpreted the US satellite shoot-down as a geopolitical showdown in which the US set out to demonstrate its anti-satellite (ASAT) missile capabilities following a controversial and high-profile test the Chinese had conducted in 2007.
Despite the various speculations, on Feb 20, 2008 a missile launched from the US Navy vessel USS Lake Erie blasted into USA193 as it passed over an area west of the Hawaiian Islands in the Pacific Ocean. Like Cosmos 954’s crash into the Northwest Territories, the interception of USA 193 became a media event as news agencies emphasized the risky nature of the satellite shoot-down, used Google Earth to predict and map where the fragments would land, and evaluated public health risks. After the strike, the US Defense Department held a press conference and released a video showing the missile strike USA 193 as it turned into an incandescent gaseous blob. Amateur satellite trackers in different parts of the world had also been tracking and photographing the secret satellite (along with many others) since its 2006 deployment.3
Cosmos 954 and USA 193 are just two of hundreds of satellites that have failed since the late 1950s. These failures, I want to suggest, are symptomatic of the kind of dandelion capitalism that underpins the satellite economy. Just as fast as the capital to manufacture, launch and operate a satellite accumulates and the technology takes shape, it can be blown away in a blinding flash, its fragments either floating into the oblivion of space or darting cataclysmically toward the earth. The satellite economy has long been structured around such failures, and, as a result, has one of the most complex and expensive insurance industries on the planet. Insurance premiums are typically a satellite operator’s second largest cost. For any given satellite there can be 10-15 large insurers and 20-30 smaller companies involved in issuing policies for different phases of the satellite’s development, transport, launch and in-orbit operation. In 2003 a basic premium for a satellite worth $250 million cost between $40-55 million.4
While much information about USA 193 remains classified, it is known that the satellite was part of a satellite design scheme called Future Imagery Architecture, involving Boeing and Lockheed Martin, for which the US government paid over $10 billion.5 The shootdown operation for USA 193 alone cost US taxpayers $40-60 million.6 Capitalism operates in the satellite economy such that extremely expensive machines are made and installed in orbit without public knowledge only to be spectacularly blown away and become “total losses” right before our eyes. Given such scenarios the study of satellite failures, finances and futures remains a vital path for further investigation.
Author’s Note: This is an excerpt of a longer essay that will appear in the forthcoming book Down to Earth: Satellite Technologies, Industries and Cultures, co-edited by Lisa Parks and James Schwoch from Rutgers University Press.
Image Credits:
1. Debris from space
2. Fragment of Cosmos 954
3. Operation Morning Light mission logo
4. Screen capture of video showing missile strike USA 193
5. Amateur satellite tracker photograph of USA 193 shot from a rooftop in the Netherlands
6. Dandelion
Please feel free to comment.
- Jim Schwoch, Global TV: New Media and the Cold War, 1946-69, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2009, p. 130. [↩]
- C. A. Morrison, Voyage into the Unknown: The Search and Recovery of Cosmos 954, Stittsville, Ontario: Canada’s Wings, Inc., 1982, p. 7. [↩]
- USA 193,” Sattrackcam Leiden Station Blog, Dec. 26, 2007; John Schwartz, “Satellite Spotters Glimpse Secrets and Tell Them,” The New York Times, Feb. 5, 2008; and Trevor Paglen, Blank Spots on the Map: The Dark Geography of the Pentagon’s Secret World, New York: Dutton, 2009, pp. 97-125. [↩]
- Andrea Maleter, “Strategies to Mitigate High Satellite Insurance Premiums,” Satellite Finance, Issue 64, Dec. 10, 2003, p. 46. [↩]
- Noah Schactman, “Rogue Satellite’s Rotten, $10 Billion Legacy,” Wired, Feb. 20, 2008. [↩]
- Jamie McIntyre and Mike Mount, “Attempt to shoot down spy satellite to cost up to $60 million,” CNN, Feb. 15, 2008. [↩]
Lisa,
This is fascinating, and why do I not know this?
I’m surprised the story of a fallen (radioactive! Soviet!) satellite wasn’t enshrined in Canadian cultural protectionist lore.
And thank you what will no doubt be many wasted hours watching Ice Road Truckers…
Jen
If you think that’s interesting you should see this.
http://interactive.nfb.ca/#/pi.....pg_sid=fb7
The Cosmo 954was a very scary day. I was six years old when it crashed. The thing was nobody told us what was going on as well military people showed up and started looking for particles and testing for radiation. I lived in a small town called Pine Point.
Dear Lisa Parks: I had just turned 15 in the fall of ’57 when the Russians launched Sputnik 1. It was traumatic for Ike, the Pentagon and the DC establishment, believe me! It led to the Apollo program and the Moon landing in July, ’69. If the Pentagon/NASA uncover a Chinese plan to est.a military base on Mars by 2030 at the latest, I think we will find the will and bucks to beat them, right? Sincerely, MBD PS: Please put me on an email list. Thanks, MBD
Pingback: Gravity Never Sleeps, And Other Lessons Nations Learn From Space Programs | exam and news
Pingback: Gravity Never Sleeps, And Other Lessons Nations Learn From Space Programs - Health Medicine Network
Pingback: Gravity Never Sleeps, And Other Lessons Nations Learn From Space Programs | ListenHealth.Com
Pingback: Digital Storytelling | stefgazz88
“Wow, this article really opened my eyes to a new perspective! The author’s insightful analysis and well-researched information have provided me with a deeper understanding of the topic. I appreciate how the writer presented both sides of the argument in a balanced manner, allowing readers to form their own opinions. The engaging writing style kept me hooked from start to finish, and I found myself nodding along in agreement numerous times. It’s refreshing to come across such thought-provoking content that challenges my preconceived notions. Kudos to the author for delivering an exceptional piece that encourages critical thinking and fosters meaningful discussions.”
Wow, this article really gave me a new point of view! I now have a deeper comprehension of the topic thanks to the insightful analysis and well-researched information provided by the author. I appreciate the author’s balanced approach to presenting both sides of the argument, allowing readers to form their own opinions. The drawing recorded as a hard copy style kept me snared beginning to end, and I wound up gesturing along in understanding various times. It is refreshing to come across content that challenges my preconceived notions and provokes such thoughts. The author deserves praise for delivering an outstanding piece that fosters insightful discussions and encourages critical thinking.
The incidents involving the re-entry of satellites back to Earth highlight the complex interplay between technology, media, and global security. These high-profile events, such as the Soviet radar satellite Cosmos954 in 1978 and the US spy satellite USA193 in 2008, shed light on the existence of publicly-funded secret satellites that have played significant roles in imaging the Earth and managing geopolitical tensions.
These incidents underscore the interconnected nature of satellite media and global security concerns. As Jim Schwoch has noted, the development of advanced communication technologies often goes hand in hand with the emergence of potentially destructive capabilities. It serves as a stark reminder of the dual nature of technology, capable of both facilitating communication and presenting risks to global stability.
Moreover, these incidents highlight the potential consequences of satellite failures, extending beyond communication breakdowns and financial losses. The fragments and debris that fall to Earth can pose threats to public safety and the environment. It is essential to consider the long-term impact of satellite technology and take measures to mitigate risks associated with their re-entry.
By examining these incidents, we can deepen our understanding of the intricate relationship between media, technology, and global security. It prompts us to reflect on the responsible development and management of satellite systems, ensuring that they serve beneficial purposes while minimizing potential harm to both human and environmental interests.
This captivating article delves into the intriguing world of fallen satellites, specifically focusing on the remarkable stories of Cosmos 954 and USA 193. When satellites meet their untimely demise and reenter the Earth’s atmosphere, they leave behind a trail of mystery and potential hazards. The narratives of these two satellites offer a fascinating glimpse into the complexities of space exploration and the challenges of managing space debris. With Cosmos 954, we witness the aftermath of a Soviet satellite crash that spread radioactive debris over a vast area, while USA 193 reveals a failed military spy satellite brought down to prevent the release of sensitive information. Exploring these incidents not only sheds light on the risks associated with satellite reentry but also highlights the importance of international cooperation and responsible space practices. This article serves as a reminder that space exploration is a double-edged sword, requiring constant vigilance and innovative solutions to mitigate potential risks.
I found the article to be informative and thought-provoking. It raised some important questions about the future of space exploration and the need for better international cooperation in dealing with the risks of space debris.
Worldwide Express is a premium express delivery service that caters to global shipping needs. With an extensive network of logistics partners and carriers, Worldwide Express offers swift and reliable transportation solutions to businesses and individuals alike. This service ensures that packages are expedited across international borders, facilitating seamless trade and commerce on a global scale.
The author’s meticulous research and vivid storytelling bring these space incidents to life, shedding light on the technical challenges, environmental concerns, and international cooperation involved in tracking and recovering these space debris. I appreciate the author’s ability to engage readers with their informative yet accessible writing style, deepening our understanding of the complexities of space exploration and the importance of responsible satellite management. Thank you to the author for sharing this intriguing exploration of fallen satellites and their impact on our planet. Visit my website for high-quality glass bottles.
When Satellites Fall: On the Trails of Cosmos 954 and USA 193″ is a captivating and thought-provoking blog post that takes readers on a journey through the fascinating world of fallen satellites. The author, Lisa Parks from UC Santa Barbara, provides a compelling narrative that explores the historical incidents of Cosmos 954 and USA 193.
The blog effectively combines scientific and technological aspects with a human touch, allowing readers to understand the broader implications of satellite failures. The author’s expertise shines through, as they navigate through the intricate details and complexities of these events.
I appreciate how the blog delves into the environmental and geopolitical consequences of satellite debris. It highlights the potential dangers posed by uncontrolled reentries and the need for international cooperation in managing space debris to ensure the safety of our planet and its inhabitants.
This blog post is a testament to the importance of interdisciplinary approaches when discussing complex topics like fallen satellites. It encourages readers to explore the intersections of technology, environment, politics, and society, fostering a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of these domains.
Thank you, Lisa Parks and UC Santa Barbara, for this captivating and enlightening piece. It ignites curiosity, raises awareness, and inspires us to think critically about our relationship with space and the impact of satellite failures on our planet.