Gertrude Berg, “Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg,” and the Re-Discovery of a Television Auteur
Bernard M. Timberg / University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

On July 10, 2009 an unusual film biography of an unusual television and radio broadcasting pioneer will premiere at the Lincoln Plaza and Quad Cinemas in New York. The film is Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg, and the filmmaker is Aviva Kempner, who had previously produced the commercially and critically acclaimed documentary The Life and Times of Hank Greenberg in 1998. The film will move to the Beekman Theater on July 17 and then go to theaters nationally.

Kempner’s new documentary biography, and a recent Syracuse University Press book, ‘Something on My Own’: Gertrude Berg and American Broadcasting, 1929-56, by Glenn D. Smith1, bring to life one of television’s formidable pioneers: Gertrude Berg. One of the tag line’s for the Kempner documentary is: “The most famous woman in America that you never heard of.” And, indeed, whereas most Americans know Lucille Ball, Jackie Gleason, Burns and Allen and Milton Berle, few have heard of Gertrude Berg.

It turns out that Gertrude Berg was the founder of the family situation comedy on radio and television. She was Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz rolled into one, a business genius and negotiator as well as performer, writer, director and auteur of her own show — and this during an era when women in up-front power positions were rare. She was known as “Molly Goldberg” on her show The Goldbergs, which ran from 1929-49 on radio and from 1949-56 on television. Kempner’s film gives a fascinating multi-sided portrait of Gertrude Berg, the demons that drove her and the undeniable imagination and talent that made her such a prolific writer-producer and star of early television. Gertrude Berg had extraordinary powers of observation, love for her grandparents’ generation, and an innate drive to write and perform evident from her teenage years when she entertained the children of guests at her father’s Catskills hotel.


On the set of The Goldbergs

The Goldbergs was The Cosby Show of its time. Instead of an upper middle class African American family in the 1980s, tens of millions of listeners and viewers joined an iconic lower middle class Jewish family in the Bronx. At one point the radio show was simultaneously aired on all three networks, something that had never happened before, and by the end Gertrude Berg’s salary had increased to the then-phenomenal $7500 a week. She received royalties from a daily newspaper comic strip of The Goldbergs and at approximately $500,000 a year, was one of the best known and highest-paid women in America.

The fact that Gertrude Berg was an outspoken liberal and that the The Goldbergs gave a frank depiction of Jewish ethnicity at the height of the McCarthy period, when anti-communism and anti-semitism were rife and often interconnected2, also made the show stand out. Despite Jewish broadcasting executives’ anxiety about shows that were “too Jewish,” The Goldbergs created one place where Jewish audiences had a chance to see themselves.

Three generations of Jewish Americans were represented on the show. On one side of Molly Goldberg and her husband Jake was the first-generation “Uncle David,” with the characteristic shrug of the shoulders and Yiddish theater inflection that made him endearing. On the other side were the third-generation “kids” who were becoming fully American. But it was Molly Goldberg herself, placed squarely in the middle, still speaking the Yiddish-inflected language of the Bronx when she moved to the suburbs years later, who created the central vitality of the show as she opened it each week from her window in the Bronx.

Aviva Kempner’s film and Glenn D. Smith’s book are not solitary phenomena. They are part of a broader re-emergence of interest in ethnicity in popular culture and Jewish ethnicity in particular. This re-discovery of Yiddishkeit — the language, humor, and folk artistry that accompanied the Yiddish-speaking wave of immigration to the U.S. in the latter part of the nineteenth and early twentieth century — has been represented by the rediscovery of traditional Jewish Klezmer music, in its many neo-Klezmer forms; by the Yiddish Radio Project broadcast on National Public Radio3; by the amazing new Yiddish Book Center in Northhampton, Massachusetts4; by a major exhibition, Entertaining America: Jews, Movies and Broadcasting, put on by the Jewish Museum of New York in 2003, and the Princeton University Press book that came out the year of the exhibit (J. Hoberman and Jeffrey Shandler, eds, Entertaining America: Jews, Movies and Broadcasting, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.)); and by Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policeman’s Union, which, as of December 2008, was in pre-production for a movie by the Coen Brothers.

Yiddish Policeman\'s Union

Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policeman’s Union

Why did it take so long for recognition to come to a performer who had such an obviously long run and impact on the radio and television industry? How did Lucille Ball become such an icon of early television when, up to this point at least, most Americans have never heard of “Gertrude Berg”?

The answers are multiple – technical, economic, and cultural. Only relatively poor quality kinescopes were available for the classic episodes of The Goldbergs in the Bronx. Desi Arnaz and Lucille Ball had high quality 16 mm masters for syndication and re-runs. I Love Lucy was identified with one network, CBS, throughout its run. It had the advantage of simple network brand identification and loyalty. Through the vagaries of its business history, The Goldbergs appeared on three separate networks (CBS, NBC, and Dumont). Then there was the crucial period during which Philip Loeb, “Jake Goldberg” on the show, was driven off the air because his name appeared on the Red Channels blacklist. Gertrude Berg’s spirited defense of her co-star was, in retrospect, heroic. But her liberal credentials and battle to keep Loeb on the air put her, by association, in the penumbra of the blacklist. It certainly made it both more difficult for her to keep the show on the air as long as she did, and it discouraged Berg and the show from being acknowledged in broadcasting history memorials afterwards.

It is also true that the late fifties and early sixties were a time when other ethnic shows (I Remember Mama, The Life of Riley) were losing favor in the new multi-sponsor corporate environment of network television. Finally, a show like I Love Lucy had the advantage of having instantly recognizable physical humor, pratfalls, and comedy that went straight for the laughs—belly laughs, rolling laughs. The comedy and humor in The Goldbergs and other “dramedies” of the time like I Remember Mama were of a gentler kind, folding into the human situations and characters portrayed. The show was not something that would stop a viewer flipping through the channels watching re-runs on TV Land with the immediate jolt of its images or humor. You would have to want to return to that earlier time and savor the intricacies and richness of the writing, plots, and ethical and moral dilemmas to truly enjoy a show like The Goldbergs.

The Goldbergs

Gertrude Berg as “Mrs. Goldberg”

Now, fifty years after the last episode of The Goldbergs, its time may have finally come. With only the suburban “Haverville” episodes of The Goldbergs commercially available up to now, in the next few years the UCLA Film and Television Archive is preparing commercial DVD distribution for the Bronx shows as well. Good television history and criticism are playing a role as well. Aviva Kempner’s documentary and Glenn D. Smith’s comprehensive history of Gertrude Berg finally do justice to a broadcasting pioneer who did as much or more than anyone else to shape the genre of a family, and a situation, on television.

Image Credits:
1. Yoo Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg!
2. On the set of The Goldbergs
3. Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policeman’s Union
4. Gertrude Berg as “Mrs. Goldberg”

Please feel free to comment.

  1. Glenn D. Smith, Jr. ‘Something on My Own: Gertrude Berg and American Broadcasting, 1929-56,’ The Television Series, Robert J. Thompson, Series Editor, Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 207. []
  2. See Arthur Miller’s first novel, Focus, 1945, and Laura Z. Hobson’s Gentleman’s Agreement, 1947, brought to the screen that same year by Darryl Zanuck to win the Academy Award. Both are searing indictments of anti-semitism in late 40s and 50s America. []
  3. Produced by musician and historian Henry Sapoznik with MacArthur Fellow radio documentary producer David Isay, the 10-part Yiddish Radio Project series won a Peabody award in 2002 and continued on-line with a 26-week festival of Yiddish radio. See also: []
  4. Founded by MacArthur Fellow Aaron Lansky, the Center is supported by 30,000 members and bills itself as “the fastest growing Jewish cultural organization in the country”. []


  • Mabel Rosenheck

    Thank you for an excellent column!

    I’ve always been fascinated by the early ethnic sitcoms and how they fit in or compare to the presence or absence of African-American and Latino (among other ethnicities) sitcoms in the last twenty or thirty years. The continuum between early sitcoms like I Love Lucy and ethnic families like the Goldbergs is rich territory for further exploring the history of the under-studied half hour comedy series. Not to mention the connections between an auteur like Berg and “based on the stand up comedy of…” television shows.
    It’s also striking that though Jewish comedy is fully entrenched on network television, I can’t think of another Jewish family sitcom. What happened to the Jewish family on television?

  • Interesting discussion.

    Mabel, within Jewish TV scholarship the question of the “Jewish” family has been coming up for years. To be sure, Jewish families appear in shows like Seinfeld, Curb, Mad About You, thirtysomething, Arrested Development, The O.C. (and lots of others), but they don’t have the cultural centrality—the foregrounding of Jewish cultural traditions—of a show like The Goldbergs. One of the questions this raises for me is what we are looking for as constitutive of “Jewish families” when we watch TV. What we think this would look like and who would be part of it and so on. How this has changed from the period in which Goldberg herself was producing and performing.

    Something else that struck me on reading your column… Serra Tinic’s recent post about Canadian reruns provides an interesting counterpoint to the absence you remark upon here, Bernard. In the US context there is a greater assumption that texts will be available in syndication and, now, on DVD. The absence of The Goldbergs, given it’s important as a cultural text, really stands out because of this. In Canada, as Serra notes, this absence is the norm.


  • I grew UP on the lower East Side with Molly Goldberg looking out the windodw – ( didn’t everybody?) and laughed myself silly every week. She was the best! I always wondered why I never saw any re-runs again (how I longed for them). Now I know why. I can’t tell you how happy I am to see her again!

    My husband who is also my age must of thought I was making her up . I kept asking him ” why don’t they have re-runs” ? He didn’t have a TV that early turns out.

    Anyhow – welcome Molly! It’s been too long. Lucille was great but Molly was first! Oye veh…I can’t wait!

  • Is there any way I can get a see Aviva Kempners film Yoohoo Mrs. Goldberg or has a DVD been produced that I could buy? I live near San Francisco. Is it coming to California? I really want to share this with a friend. Molly Goldberg gave us a way to make a little bit of an awkward situation absolutely darling. She is my son-in-laws mother. She smokes. When she visits her son she stays with me. I have asthma. So I have a table and chairs and an ashtrray out on my l;arge patio. She goes out to smoke. The first time this happened I went to my window and kneeled down and called Yoo Hoo Molly Molly Goldberg. It made her laugh and we’ve used it everytime since. She is now going to be 83 and I told her I’d found some DVDs of Molly Goldberg because she never saw or heard her. But before I could get them someone else bought them. I would really like to have Aviva Kempners film for her as well as me. Lets face it, Molly is chicken soup- AND DON’T WE NEED IT.

    Thanks for the opportunity – I loved Molly when I was a kid because she loved back – Susan Taylor

  • Pingback: TV, the Auteur, and Quality | J412: TV Criticism

  • Pingback: A Look Back at the ’90 CBS TV Show “Brooklyn Bridge” | Untapped Cities

  • Which Catskill Hotel did Gertrude Berg’s parents own ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *